Complete scenario rehearsal
A person says a scheduled support activity did not happen and asks whether this means their request has been rejected. A colleague suggests marking the activity complete so the weekly record looks tidy. How would you respond?
Say your own answer before opening the example.
Reveal the worked response
I would not mark the activity complete unless the approved source record supports that entry. I would listen to the person’s concern, acknowledge that they want clarity, and explain that I cannot decide whether their request has been accepted or rejected. I would check the schedule and available records within my duties, distinguish what I observed from what I was told, and note the discrepancy through the approved process. I would refer the outcome question to the authorised staff member and confirm who will follow up, without promising a result or timing I cannot control. I would tell the supervisor that I was asked to change the record and provide the factual context, rather than accusing the colleague or conducting my own inquiry. Any required report would use the designated channel and protect confidential information. This preserves record accuracy, treats the person respectfully and leaves the decision with the proper authority.
Try the follow-up questions
- What would you say if the person insists that you confirm the outcome immediately?
- How would you report the colleague’s suggestion without turning it into an unsupported accusation?
Check your answer
- Did I protect the record from an unsupported change?
- Did I distinguish my role from the authorised decision-maker?
- Did I identify a respectful follow-up and reporting path?